North American Research Group in Ancient Myth and Mythography
The NARGAMM Working Papers in myth and mythgography aims at making available the most current research on the subject. Anyone may submit the paper to one of the directors, but encourage all those who submit to become a member of NARGAMM.
These papers are pre-publication version of articles, book chapters, and reviews. Papers offered here are in-progress, under consideration, or forthcoming, and are offered on this site by the author as-is. They are not refereed, nor is the quality guaranteed by the directors of NARGAMM or the University of New Hampshire. It is our policy to keep all working papers posted unless otherwise notified by the author(s). Copyright to papers posted here remains with the authors. Users of this site may download papers for their own personal use. The redistribution of the papers is forbidden without the written consent of the authors. Upon publication, copyright may transfer to the publisher. It is the author's responsibility to request to have the paper removed from this site.
Authors are asked to create a PDF of their paper and to submit it through the form button below.
Charles Delattre, U. Paris Ouest Nanterre
A detailed overview of the corpus of Antoninus Liberalis’ Collection of Metamorphoses, defining the text, considering the authorship and date, and analyzing the narrative strategies and networks within the corpus.
Cameron's Mythographus Vergilianus Reconsidered
R. Scott Smith
This paper explores the claims made by Alan Cameron (Greek Mythography in the Roman World, Oxford 2004) that there was a single mythological commentary on the works of Vergil, arguing that the evidence does not seem to support the contention. By surveying the extant commentaries, primarily Servius, the expanded commentary of Servius Danielis (DS), Brevis Expositio, and Pseudo-Probus (among other exegetical material), I argue that the nature of mythological exegesis was seen as one part of the grammaticus' function and not a separate intellectual activity.
Written for the conference "Myth Criticism in Antiquity" held from Oct. 15-17 at the University of New Hampshire-Durham under the auspices of the John C. Rouman Symposium for Research in Classics and the Humanities.